Friday, May 31, 2013

Kindly Ones

The Kindly Ones, the Erinyes, the Eumenides, the Furies. Named by Virgil as Alecto, Megaera, and Tisiphone.  While in myth the Kindly Ones may be more than three in number, in modern conception they seem to have become three.  Which of reminds me of my post on the Deficiencies of theTriple Goddess.  But that’s not the point of the Kindly Ones. 

As the Kindly Ones, their job was to extract vengeance, which doesn’t sound very kind.  In the Iliad they are referred to as "those who beneath the earth punish whosoever has sworn a false oath.”  While the Iliad in particular seems to emphasize characters swearing on the Erinyes’s name in a “May god strike me down if I lie” kind of way.  I am not concerned with the cosmic punishment angle, but I am concerned with my own consistency in keeping my oaths.  In my day to day life, I may make a lot of promises.  I may agree to work with a colleague on a project (one that I probably should be working on now), I may promise my students that I will grade/return their essays by a certain date; I agree to keep specific records for my job and to turn in all kinds of paperwork on time.  I may even feel that I have made some unspoken promises, for example, to be a good friend.  Or in less elevated term, I may feel that I have promised to not be a jerk. 

The thing is, it is easy to make promises.  It is easy to say “yes” – it is not always as is to follow through.  As a witch and a writer, I know that words have power.  They influence people’s emotions and more importantly they can change the nature of reality. I know there are a number of theorists who have expressed this far more eloquently than I am – but off the cuff, I can’t think specifically of names (I’m thinking Luce Irigaray or perhaps Hélène Cixous – somewhere my grad school professors are weeping).  But words change our reality, not even in the witchcraft spell way.  The words we choose impact how we view/create reality.  From this mindset, my words must matter.  I must be responsible for the words I choose and the words I use.  This would then mean that the promises I make, also matter.  The Kindly Ones are a reminder, often a bloody maybe even frightening reminder, of the power of words.

I think their name (the words used for them) “the Kindly Ones” dovetails nicely here.  They are not “evil” or “bad” – they are kind, or at least they are bringing a kindness.  The character Orestes (in The Oresteia)  is trapped between conflicting needs.  He needs to seek revenge for his father (‘cause that’s what people did) – but to seek revenge, he must kill his mother.  He has two conflicting vows.  The furies torment him for his crimes, and he eventually seeks out Athena.  The furies eventually relent, recognizing that he is in an impossible situation (and the convoluted nature of Greek tragedy).  Thus, the Kindly Ones also serve to remind me to be kind.  To be kind and try to understand the many influences and obligations that bind people, that trap them with their words.  To remember that kindness is sometimes the correct option (not harshness or vengeance).    

For me the Kindly Ones are a two-fold metaphor about words and deeds.  Words and deeds both have consequences, but the consequences often must be measured against many factors.  The contemporary idea of the furies as mindless hunters seeking vengeance, does not at all do them justice.  Even the mythic invocation of their names in making of oaths, reduces them.  The Kindly Ones are my reminder to keep track of my words and as such my reality. 
 
Actual text from the Iliad:
Agamemnon looked into the vault of heaven and
prayed saying, "I call Jove the first and mightiest of all gods to
witness, I call also Earth and Sun and the Erinyes who dwell below
and take vengeance on him who shall swear falsely, that I have laid
no hand upon the girl Briseis, neither to take her to my bed nor otherwise,
but that she has remained in my tents inviolate. If I swear falsely
may heaven visit me with all the penalties which it metes out to those
who perjure themselves."
Entire Iliad

Monday, May 13, 2013

Response to Inciting a Riot (the blog) Re: The Triple Goddess


The Deficiency of the Triple Goddess


So blog fail - I started and abandoned this project pretty quickly.  Well I'm going to start again, maybe.  

I was thinking about a post on Inciting A Riot.  He'd asked about the Triple Goddess (Maiden, Mother, Crone).  From my research, she's largely a modern creation.  While triple goddess of various sorts exist in mythology, there is no "maiden, mother, crone" deity.  This isn't some "if it's not ancient - it's not for me" rant.  Rather, it is a consideration of what MMC represents.  Even looking at her aspects as metaphor, they are still sexist.  They reduce women to their biology and sexuality.  Even as a metaphor, I'm supposed to accept that my biology should still matter.  I'm more interested in considering my gods as what they do beyond human biology.

When people try to explain MMC as a metaphor, they engage in all kinds of strange rheotical devices and convoluted explanations about how "Mother" means something other than literal biology.  Yet, they always return to almost identical ideas.  It seems to me that if \the explanation takes that much work, drifts so far from what the word actually means, and sometimes ceases to have any connection to the meaning of the word - then perhaps the MMC fails as a metaphor?  

If a goddess of metaphor is needed, why not metaphors that are not essentialist in its view of women (and possibly men)?

I am more than my biology, and I do not live my life as if it my uterus determines who I am.  Why would I want my goddess to be determined by her's?